Boardpath · For Boards · Chair and CEO Intensive

Coaching

Chair and CEO Intensive

A written, tested operating agreement between the two offices at the center of the board, so authority is settled before it is tested rather than after.

Works on

Authority and Follow-Through

Format

Coaching engagement

Duration

Four to six weeksPlaceholder pending confirmation

In the room

Chair and chief executiveseparately, then together

Adopted by

The boardnot a private understanding

Whether this fits

Any one of these is enough to justify the work.

Two or more, and it is usually already costing the board more than the engagement would.

01

The chair and the chief executive are each behaving reasonably and still ending up at odds.

02

A new chair or a new chief executive has just taken office and the arrangement is being inherited rather than agreed.

03

The board responded to one boundary dispute by asking for more reporting on everything.

04

Something happened between meetings and it is still not clear who should have acted.

05

Directors can feel the friction and have started routing around one of the two offices.

Nobody in this story is behaving badly.

Which is exactly what makes it hard to fix. The chair and the chief executive are each acting reasonably on a different understanding of the same arrangement, and neither has any reason to suspect the other is working from a different map.

What happens

Separately, then together, then tested against something real.

Week 1Separately, first

Boardpath meets each office alone. Both describe the same events, and the distance between the two accounts is usually where the work is. Neither party is misrepresenting anything; they are operating on different understandings of the same arrangement.

Weeks 2–3Draw the boundary

Reserved powers, delegated authority, the thresholds at which a matter returns to the board, and what happens between meetings. Drafted against situations that have actually occurred at this organization, not hypotheticals, because hypotheticals are easy to agree on.

  • What is reserved to the board, stated specifically enough to actually apply
  • What is delegated, and up to what limit
  • What the chief executive does when something exceeds that limit and the board does not meet for five weeks
Week 4Together

The two offices work through the draft in the same room, including the cases where they disagree. A disagreement that is named and written down stops being friction and becomes a known position. That is a materially different working relationship.

Weeks 5–6Test it against something real

The agreement is run against the next live matter and then adjusted. An agreement that has never met a real decision has not been tested, and the failure mode is always the case nobody anticipated.

At closeThe board adopts it

The agreement is the board’s, not a private understanding between two people. It goes to the board, the board adopts it, and it survives a change in either office.

Ready to get started?

Describe the situation, not the engagement.

Bring the matter in front of your board, why it matters now, and who is involved. One conversation is usually enough to identify the smallest useful next step, which is sometimes this engagement and often something narrower.